The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:04, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewer instructions Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count A Simple Word Counter Reviewers' template Find sources (notability) Hook length

• ... that PSLV-C34 (pictured), India's expendable launch system, deployed 20 satellites in low earth orbit in a single mission on 22 June 2016?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ethel Thomas

Created by AKS.9955 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC).

• Some issues found.
  • ✓ This article is new and was created on 06:44, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
  • ✗ This article is too short at 1487 characters (the DYK minimum is 1500 characters)

• NOTE: Shubinator's DYK Check says this article had 1536 characters (0 words) "readable prose size" as of time and date this bot ran. — Maile (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

• • ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
  • ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
  • ✓ The probability of copyright violation is 11.5%. (confirm)
    • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• ✓ The media File:PSLV.svg is free-use
• ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 155 characters
• ✗ This is AKS.9955's 6th nomination. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:25, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

• Full review by human reviewer needed, though QPQ will be required from AKS.9955. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:19, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

• This article is new enough and is now long enough. The facts in the hook are supported by inline citations. The image appears to be OK, the article is neutral and I detected no close paraphrasing. @AKS.9955: Just waiting for a QPQ review to be done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

• Hello Cwmhiraeth, I have started the review of Ethel Thomas. This will address the QPQ issue. Thanks, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:44, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks. This nomination is now good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)