The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 05:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewer instructions Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count A Simple Word Counter Reviewers' template Find sources (notability) Hook length

Mary Healy (theologian)

(

)

... that Mary Healy, an international speaker on faith healing in the Catholic Church, only became interested in the subject during her 2014 sabbatical? Source: National Catholic Register
- ALT1: ... that Catholic biblical scholar Mary Healy spoke on faith healing at the 2021 International Eucharistic Congress? Source: same as above.
- ALT2: ... that Catholic biblical scholar Mary Healy was among the first three women appointed to the Pontifical Biblical Commission? Source: The Pilot
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Friedrich Silaban

Created by Arbitrarily0 (talk). Self-nominated at 03:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC).

I think it would be good to have a list of the books she has written. That’s always essential in an academic’s article. Thriley (talk) 04:25, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
in progress. Long enough and well referenced. I hacked at the lede as it included stuff not in the body, feel free to improve. I think Alt2 hints at a more punchy hook concerning first women to ensure the correct interpretation of the bible... or something around .."until 2014 the bible's Catholic interpretation was directed by blokes" etc. ~~Is it clear whether she thinks faith healing should be encouraged or banned?~~ However I'm more than willing to approve the offered hooks. Victuallers (talk) 10:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thriley, I have added her books to the article. @Victuallers: thanks for reviewing. You left this as "in progress," but did you mean to give this a green light? Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 18:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

What I said... I think you are missing out on a more punchy hook as the three offered are not so interesting IMO, but I can only encourage you. Approved as is. Victuallers (talk) 21:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)