The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Zanhe (talk) 06:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
No response for a month and a half

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewer instructions Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count A Simple Word Counter Reviewers' template Find sources (notability) Hook length

John Richardson (bishop of Car Nicobar)[edit]

(

)

John Richardson in 1952

... that John Richardson, who later became the first Anglican bishop to become a Member of Parliament, was sentenced to death twice during the Japanese occupation of Car Nicobar?

Reviewed: pending

Created by Soman (talk). Self-nominated at 08:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC).

~~Will review, but am too tired now.~~ --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

It is eligible according to the criteria though I think some additional work can be done here:
- Suggest a different wording for his family's origin. Car Nicobar is not a very known area in the world, so at first, I wasn't sure if that is an island, a settlement, a region, an ethnic group etc. It forced me to stop reading the article and go to the article about Car Nicobar.
- In 1906 he was sent to Burma... Do you know who sent him?
- Maybe expand the lead section a bit, with elements from the His legacy and second World War sections.

Otherwise you are good to go.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 09:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

The hook should specify that the Parliament is India's, not another country's. One presumes that English or Canadian bishops were members of their national parliaments way before Mr Richardson had a similar record in India. Dahn (talk) 16:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Above issues have not been addressed nor the article edited since the day the nomination was submitted, and the QPQ review is over five weeks past due despite last week's talk-page ping. This all needs to be addressed very soon if the nomination is to proceed. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Issues still unaddressed; marking for closure. Should the nominator return and begin work on the issues before this is closed, the review process can resume. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2017 (UTC)