The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:57, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Iobitridol

5x expanded by Anypodetos (talk). Self-nominated at 08:50, 21 March 2021 (UTC).

  • The article is long enough (expanded enough) and new enough. I assume good faith on the offline references. A QPQ has been completed. The hook is fine. I'm not sure why the 5th reference links to a page of search results. SL93 (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review! I can't think of another way to source the fact that it is not approved in the US. Maybe it was overkill to source that fact in the first place. It's probably not something that's likely to be challenged. Would it help to simply remove that ref, what do you think? --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 06:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Anypodetos Would this source work? - "Iobitridol is not commercially available in the United States but is available (250-350 mg iodine(I)/ml) in Europe for angiography, venography, and computed tomography (CT) examinations." SL93 (talk) 06:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
  • I see that it's a source you had for something else, but anyway it's properly referenced now. SL93 (talk) 06:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)