The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Hugo Moutinho[edit]

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) 5x expanded by Royroydeb (talk). Self nominated at 08:10, 9 March 2015 (UTC).

  • except there is nothing to support this hook, is there? It's not even in the Wikipedia article, let alone the external reference. So the next step is to check the sources match the article, then use a fact from the article as a proposed hook, then we can try this again. C679 22:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Does not meet criteria. In particular, the hook is not accurate or cited. C679 23:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  • This has been in the second paragraph under the "Career" section since the date of nomination : He became the first Portuguese player to score a hattrick in Romania in November 2008, against Mureşul Deva.souce. — Maile (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Needs complete review. — Maile (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Sorry Maile, the text in the hook and the text in the article are two different claims. C679 16:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  • ALT1 ... that Hugo Moutinho became the first Portuguese footballer to score a hat-trick in Romania? Fuebaey (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
@Fuebaey: The hook looks good! RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 07:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
@Vanamonde93: QPQ done - Template:Did you know nominations/Long Live the Royals. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
This is GTG. I have to say, though, I felt a slight reluctance given the brevity of the QPQ. How did you manage not to spot the fact that the QPQ was not, in fact, complete when you reviewed it? In any case, what's done is done, insufficient to fail the review. Please be a little more thorough next time. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)