The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:19, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Hierarchical Structure of the Big Five

[edit]

Created/expanded by Armsbf11 (talk). Self nom at 01:21, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

  • Incomplete nomination, there are no wiki-links in the hook. --Soman (talk) 08:30, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Added link and otherwise formatted hook. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 08:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
I think that this article goes into sufficient depth on a relatively narrow aspect of the Big Five that it warrants it's own page. Fully merging it with the existing Big Five page seems inappropriate for the same reason that merging all the information on each individual Big Five trait was inappropriate. I suggest creating a summary section on the Big Five page which links to this more in-depth treatment of the topic.Armsbf11 (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
  • The "Big Five" is a theoretical structure, one of many. A theoretical model doesn't influence our behavior. MathewTownsend (talk) 19:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Would it be better to say that "...our personality is arranged in a hierarchical structure". Perhaps the hook should be changed? Armsbf11 (talk) 23:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)