The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Greeks in Malta[edit]

5x expanded by Dahn (talk). Self-nominated at 13:59, 25 March 2018 (UTC).

  • This article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are included in the article but it is difficult to find them actually cited inline, which is a DYK requirement. If you were to add a citation in the lead where the statement appears in the third paragraph, that would solve the problem (You could remove it again afterwards!). The article is neutral and I detected no copyright problems. QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  • @Cwmhiraeth: I tend to avoid citations in the lead, particularly when they're redundant. Please note however that both facts are cited inline. One appears as: By 1580, Hospitaller Malta was organizing privateer raids on Ottoman Tripolitania and the Levant, attracting some Catholic Greek volunteers—perhaps as many as 5% of the total privateers. The other: Between 1550 and 1600, some 20% of the captives were Christians, many of them Greeks; the policy was to release most non-Muslims, but in practice some Greeks were still kept as slaves, in perpetuity. Dahn (talk) 17:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  • I agree about not having citations in the lead. The sentences you quote support the hook less well than the single sentence in the lead, but I'll give the nomination a tick and we'll see if anyone else objects. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)