The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 09:13, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Geostationary orbit

  • Reviewed: <5 DYKs so no QPQ needed

Improved to Good Article status by Spacepine (talk). Self-nominated at 03:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC).

  • Reviewing
  • Article is new enough on GA status, long enough, well cited and neutral.
  • No copyvio on Earwig
  • Hooks are short enough, of general interest and supported by inline citations. Consider tweaking ALT1 to read '...that the concept of geostationary orbit was popularised...'
  • QPQ not required
  • Informative, well written article. Good to go. Papamac (talk) 08:12, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, edited ALT1 as suggested --Spacepine (talk) 12:05, 4 October 2019 (UTC)