The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 03:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Family 1

• ... that Family 1, a closely related group of Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, place the story of the woman caught in adultery not in its usual place in the Gospel of John, but at the end of the book as a separate story? Source: Comfort, Philip Wesley (2017). A Commentary on Textual Additions to the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregal Publications, pp. 83-84
  • Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by Stephen Walch (talk). Self-nominated at 16:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Family 1; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• @Stephen Walch: This isn't a full review, but the current hook cannot be used as it is over 200 characters long. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

• Hi @Narutolovehinata5: : how about:

• ALT1 ... that Family 1, a closely related group of Greek New Testament manuscripts, place the story of the woman caught in adultery at the end of the Gospel of John as a separate story? Source: Comfort, Philip Wesley (2017). A Commentary on Textual Additions to the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregal Publications, pp. 83-84

• That should be 175 characters. :)
• Or even:

• that Family 1, a closely related group of Greek New Testament manuscripts place the story of the woman caught in adultery not in chapter 8, but at the end of the Gospel of John as a separate story?
• That is 197 characters.

Let's go with the one that is 175 characters. Full review still needed. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

• New enough GA. Nominator confirmed QPQ-exempt. AGF on the book source; hook fact is reasonably interesting. Two portions need inline citations if the citations mid-sentence do not support them, Stephen Walch, and this must be fixed/confirmed first: Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
  • also confirmed 138, 357, 994, 2517 and 2575 as core members of ƒ1 in John's Gospel.
  • and then Parker rehearses Josef Schmid's views who considered 2886 and 205 to be daughters of 209's lost sister.

•  Hello @Sammi Brie: believe I've added in the required refs as requested :) Stephen Walch (talk) 21:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. This can proceed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)