The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by FITINDIA 12:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Elizabeth Chambers Morgan

[edit]

Created by MidwestCuttlefish (talk). Self-nominated at 20:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC).

I can see that snippet of 608 in Google Books. Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:47, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
@Bammesk: How does that look? Also, thanks for your edits. MidwestCuttlefish (talk) 20:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
That's good. I added a google-snippet link to the hook above (per user:Maury Markowitz). I found ref. 3 online, I also did some spot checks of refs 1 and 2 with google-snippets, I found some close paraphrasing, and I will look into it some more. User:MidwestCuttlefish, for example, this string is a direct copy of ref. 1: "was one of ten children of Thomas and Sarah Chambers, who were both unskilled factory workers", this string is a direct copy of ref. 3 except for the two words in italics: "Morgan led the group of Chicago women who established the Ladies' Federal Labor Union No. 2703". You can help by removing similar wording/sentence structures. Interesting article. Bammesk (talk) 04:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
I removed close paraphrases and edited the article, diff (I have refs 1, 3, 4, not 2, I edited sentences cited to ref 2 anyway, to remove potential paraphrase violations). Nomination is good to go. Bammesk (talk) 19:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! MidwestCuttlefish (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)