The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:03, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK toolbox
DYK check Reviewer instructions Earwig's Copyvio Detector QPQ check Character count A Simple Word Counter Reviewers' template Find sources (notability) Hook length

Cyclothymia[edit]

• ... that Cyclothymia is a subtype of Bipolar Disorder in DSM-5? Source: "DSM-5" [1]
  • ALT1:... that Cyclothymia has received the least attention of all the mood disorders but is in fact very common? Source: "Perugi" [2]

5x expanded by Emcmanus1 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC).

General eligibility:

• New enough:
• Long enough:
• Other problems:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Invalid status "Y" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"

Cgorman4 (talk)

• I think it is important that an experienced, independent DYK reviewer check this, as both reviewer and nominator are new to DYK and to Wikipedia in general, and both appear to be taking the same class at Notre Dame. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

• At the moment this is ineligible for DYK because it has some "medical citation needed" tags. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

• Marking for closure. The nominator has not edited since the day they nominated this article at DYK, and the bulk of the nominations that came out of the class this was from have run into problems with their medical content and not been fixed (if they weren't deleted outright at AfD). I don't see any point in waiting any further, but if someone takes this on and starts dealing with the issues before the nomination closes, the review can always be resumed. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2018 (UTC)