VWd

[edit]

Moved from Volkswagen Beetle:

"==Alternative uses for VW Beetle engines==
"
VW Beetle engine, front view. With cooling casing and fan removed
"The air-cooled 4-cylinder horizontally opposed cylinder (a flat four) has been used for many other purposes.

ATM, I just don't have the patience to merge it.... TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 07:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since almost all of it is unsourced I wouldn't suggest adding it to the article anyway. Most of it looks like WP:OR. - Ahunt (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Romseyfirebrigade.org.au, Romsey Fire Brigade Website. Retrieved 5 June 2009.
  2. ^ Home.alphalink.com.au, Whittlesea Fire brigade Website. Accessed June 5, 2009

Pre-war Engines

[edit]

Were there pre-war 985cc 25ps engines made exist? Rjluna2 (talk) 21:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name/Type of the engine(s)?

[edit]

The air-cooled Volkswagen engines had official names/types: For example, the 1192 cm³ engine is called Typ 122 and the 1584 cm³ engine is called Typ 126. However, in the article, the engines are simply named after their displacement. --Jojhnjoy (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

petrol or diesel?

[edit]

it's not obvious for non engineers 213.31.58.108 (talk) 11:32, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -  Fixed - Ahunt (talk) 12:27, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tons of white space

[edit]

Recent edits adding "clear" tags have produced a lot of white space into the article which looks really bad. I think we either need to ditch at least some of the surplus of info boxes or get more text to fill the article out. Thoughts? - Ahunt (talk) 12:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced additions

[edit]

Aside from the aviation section this article is a now a mass of unsourced text. It needs properly sourcing or it needs stubbing to the sourced text. If no one adds the sources I am happy to stub it. Discussion? - Ahunt (talk) 02:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, lacking any objections or, indeed discussion, for the past week I have removed the unsourced text. This can be re-instated at any time as long as proper refs are provided. - Ahunt (talk) 20:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hum. This wasn't great. A useful, factual page has had almost all the useful information removed and has now become a large list of aircraft, a secondary use of the page. This would benefit from being reverted. It is less informative now than it was 15 years ago! 83.216.146.123 (talk) 17:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]