Clean up

[edit]

What parts of this page need to be cleaned up so I might be able to better get around to that? Station Attendant 23:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's mostly conforming to the WikiProject above- routebox, expanded article typically. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:28, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Removed cleanup due to article extension and general page cleanup. Will continue to do further work if needed. Seicer 04:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History

[edit]

Kentucky and West Virginia

[edit]

Shouldn't the order of these two states be reversed in the route descriptions? 52 enters WV before it enters KY. ObtuseAngle 21:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Junction List

[edit]

Only 10 junctions should be here. I-85 was removed in favor of I-64. Just looking for some opinions for the list of junctions. Deigo (talk) 04:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I-85 was subsequently replaced. Geographically, I-64 is a logical addition, since there were no junctions in the box between Wytheville, VA, and Cincinnati. I-85 in NC isn't such a big deal since I-40 is only a few miles north of where US 52 meets it. However, per WP:IAR, as cited, I don't see a problem with it. I feel I-85 is a more notable route, but I-64 is logical. --MPD T / C 04:42, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't used IAR in a while, but, as I thought about it, I realized that both Deigo and I are kind of right. I-85 probably has more traffic across the highway, but I-64 is a major route for folks in the Mid-Atlantic, central Appalachia, Kentucky, and St. Louis. Furthermore, Huntington, West Virginia, the point of the intersection, is, by some measures, the nation's largest inland port and the second largest city in WV (granted, not the most important of states, but a state none the less). As the project seems to suggest rather than demand a max of ten, I'd say that in the case of this long, meandering highway, 11 would be okay, especially when it fills in a gap as large as Virginia to Cincinnati. youngamerican (wtf?) 05:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Distances in Each State

[edit]

Shouldn't Kentucky be included in the table about how far the route travels in each state? 66.42.213.127 (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on U.S. Route 52. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of U.S. Route 52 in Ohio into U.S. Route 52

[edit]

The article has expended enough to withdraw the proposal. –Fredddie™ 00:38, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This page is nothing more than an infobox, lead, and junction list. WP:USRD consensus over the years has been to paste the junction list onto the talk page of the main article, Talk:U.S. Route 52, and hold it there until someone who wants to write some prose comes along and then redirect U.S. Route 52 in Ohio to U.S. Route 52. –Fredddie™ 04:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories