The "producers who collaborated with each-other during Grand Theft Auto V's development" bit would read better as simply "producers who collaborated with each-other during the game's development"
The "music had been appropriated effectively for Grand Theft Auto V's gameplay" bit would ready better as something like "music had been appropriated effectively for gameplay".
Background and recording
"Early in Grand Theft Auto V's development" → "Early in the game's development"
"'Welcome to Los Santos', Grand Theft Auto V's main theme" → "'Welcome to Los Santos', the game's main theme"
Sourcing
Background and recording
In the third paragraph, ref#3 (Polygon) doesn't need to be used more than once in a row per WP:OVERCITE- it's currently being used twice in a row after ref#5 (Clash)
More WP:OVERCITE in fourth paragraph- just use ref#5 (Clash) at the end of the paragraph
Coverage
Could you perhaps find another paragraph's worth or two of reviews from critics?
Is any information available on commercial performance?
Neutrality
No problems here
Stability
No problems here
GA Result
If these are all addressed within the next seven days, I will pass the GAN.
I've gone through and addressed most of these problems; the two comments you made for "Coverage" will be looked into. I'm sure we can find some more information to add. -- Rhain1999(talk to me) 22:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, just let me know within the next day or two what you find. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 00:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@XXSNUGGUMSXX: In regards to your comments about coverage, I'm afraid the answer is no to both questions. I have tried to locate more reviews to add to the critical reception section, but all of the sites covered by WP:VG/RS and WP:ALBUM/SOURCE have already been used. In terms of commercial performance, nope, there's nothing. No chart history or sales reports. CR4ZE (t • c) 07:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the effort, though. Passing. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]