The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was already moved (not by me) to the standardized disambiguation naming scheme of (year film).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Lesser Evil, 1998 → The Lesser Evil — The title of the film is "The Lesser Evil", rather than "The Lesser Evil, 1998". However, there is a silent film called "The Lesser Evil" which was made in the 1920s. Can both pages have the same name and add a "see also.." to the page? Tks--TijuanaSuper8 (talk) 00:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment this is an improperly formatted multimove request. 64.229.100.61 (talk) 14:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose it has been renamed to the proper format, The Lesser Evil (1998 film). It should not move to the primary position. 64.229.100.61 (talk) 14:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment if you're suggesting that the primary name become a disambiguation page, then I support that idea. 64.229.100.61 (talk) 14:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, rename the other one to "...(1912 film)", leave this one as it is, and do a dab page.--Kotniski (talk) 08:20, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose WP:NCF states that if multiple films have the same title, then the disambig is the year. I've moved the 1912 film, and will make The Lesser Evil either a redirect or disambig. Lugnuts (talk) 10:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.