The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 03:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Link is sooooooooooooooooo hot!![hyperbole] <3 <3 <3 TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 03:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Lead section adequately summarizes article. Fiction is out-of-universe. List incorporation policy does not apply. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | No bare URLs spotted. Reference section easy to spot. |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | The article uses some sources considered to be situational per WP:VG/S. However, they are rarely ever used. There are way more reliable sources than situational sources. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | According to the Earwig report, the top result is a Discord page. Most of the pages, if not all, are reported as a false positive; game names are highlighted in red. |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | The gameplay, plot, development, and reception are covered - material that is adequate for a video game article. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Article stays focused. |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No recent edit wars. Development is at a steady pace. |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Cover art and gameplay(?) screenshot have a valid non-free use rationale. Image of Aonuma is correctly licensed. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | The gameplay screenshot gives a clear visual on what a crucial part of the gameplay looks like. Obviously, the cover art is relevant for a video game article, but I have mixed feeling about using the Aonuma image in the development section. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
TrademarkedTWOrantula, replied to your comments. The Night Watch (talk) 00:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Note: It has been a while since I've played any Zelda games (or video games in general D:). Expect me to get nothing.