This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 17 August 2016.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
@Miniapolis: Your copy-edited version (the cast section) has been reverted back by an IP. I restored it once but the IP has again changed it.- Managerarc™ talk 15:26, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Couldn't roll all the way back to the copyedited version because there was a constructive edit by another user in between. I pinged article creator Mr. Smart LION and semi-protected the article for two weeks. All the best, Miniapolis 17:22, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just after a quick glance, i am looking at an instant fail:
The covereage is not wide enough, lacks many imposrant details, and sections.
The lead itself is nowhere near GA standard
No references in parts.
Too many bare URLs
Unreliable sources.
I will wait for the nominator to go through he comments, but this looks like a very premature nomination. NumerounovedantTalk 07:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The covereage is not wide enough, lacks many imposrant details, and sections.
Citing other articles is not a valid argument while discussing reviews.
The lead itself is nowhere near GA standard
As for the lead of the article, I would give the same explanation as given above for the coverage.
Same.
No references in parts.
Please tell which parts of the article need references. In my view, article has enough references.
The writer, director, production, distribution houses, runtime, picture formats are nowhere substantiated.
Too many bare URLs
Filled.
Unreliable sources.
Removed.
What makes India.com, an RS?
Further comments are welcome. Mr.SmartℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 11:48, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No pretext provided for Comedy Knights to viewers unfamiliar with teh topic.
Three reviews which are largely negative don't make up for a comprehensive section.
The production does not talk about any filming/writing details.
The mention of most of the technical aspects mentioned in teh info box are largely missing.
Also, over linking is largely persisting problem. Next time, try to ping me after leaving comments. NumerounovedantTalk 13:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry to say, but IMO this article is nowhere near the standard of GA, and needs a considerable amount of work. I suggest a PR for the suggestions as this is not the platform for it. Thank you for co operating. I will now fail the article. NumerounovedantTalk 03:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Final comments
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of The Kapil Sharma Show's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing like Season 3 of Kapil Sharma.
What here mentioned as Season 3 is the continuation of Season 2 and follows the same format and only the environment is same.
In episodes overview changes the titles as season episodes overview and make episodes list season wise 103.251.226.135 (talk) 07:23, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]