This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I've added a few screenshots to the article. They are all taken from the Cremaster 3 DVD. I am aware that the 'copyrighted screenshot category' specifies that there only be one of these images per article, but I believe that since there are 5 movies discussed within this article, it is still fair use to have more than displayed. Worst case, we can split up the cycle article into the different sections, keep the images and it would become an incentive to add information to the various sections of the cycle. -- Blahm 15:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
These films were released in a 'random', non-sequential order. I imagine that it would be prudent to list them in the initial release order rather than the current sequential order. --Thaddius 05:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 06:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
This article is terrible and I think most of it is from the guy's own site. Sounds like the same voice anyway. Wikipedians, fix this terrible article! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.57.107.61 (talk) 23:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Where on earth did the money come from to produce this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.157.89 (talk) 00:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
I know babra gladstone (of gladstone galley ny fame) put up the $ for one of them —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.78.87 (talk) 14:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
He's married to Bjork.
Can someone please explain what "self enclosed aesthetic system" is supposed to mean? --24.85.68.231 (talk) 08:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Why is this a part of the Latter-Day Saints project? What's the connection? 66.207.206.210 (talk) 19:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
The overview section is, to me, virtually unreadable psychobabble. Someone needs to rewrite it entirely. — Hex (❝?!❞) 05:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
The explanations of each film in the series are directly copied from [1], the official page for the Cremaster series. I will be deleting them shortly... normally i would fix as opposed to just deleting, but this is alot an did I not have time to re-write 5 sections. --Found5dollar (talk) 17:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
I've removed the following paragraph:
The initial sentence implies that Matthew Barney references "Vladracul". However, the quote (in context) merely states that "Vladracul" reminded the reviewer of Barney's work; the subsequent references to Mina, Marlene, Bowie, et al all refer to "Vladracul" and not to Cremaster, so are gratuitous in this article. This certainly does not demonstrate influence on Barney, and does not seem to demonstrate Barney's influence on de Brest either. Phil wink (talk) 23:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
The whole explication of the work is unreferenced. Shouldn’t it be? Otherwise is it original research? Eicatss (talk) 23:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)