GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 08:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna review this article. Stay tuned.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 08:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC) Okay. Sorry, I was busy in RL. So, let's go.[reply]

@Tintor2:That's all. Good job. Already a pretty good article.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 11:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TeenAngels1234: Rearranged most of the content involved the reception too. Thanks for the review.Tintor2 (talk) 18:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC) @TeenAngels1234: Did I miss something by any chance?Tintor2 (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: No, no. I'm just still busy. Today I'm gonna read the full article again, and, if nothing emerges, I'll promote it. Don't worry :')--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. So:

@Tintor2: Good work~

@TeenAngels1234: I think I covered anything but can't find that however.Tintor2 (talk) 23:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. Promoted. Good prose, good sources, and good information.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 00:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]