This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
its also worth mentioning that Suzy posed for the UK cinema poster of the French film Pussy Talk (Le Sexe qui parle)[1], but isn’t in the actual film, despite what is said on that film’s Wikipedia page. Her image was also used in the poster of another film she wasn’t in called Nympho Girls(1980, Walter Boos), probably without her consent that time.
--Gavcrimson 13:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Some clips currently up on youtube
Get some in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nCTgLnSfMs
Rutland Weekend Television (‘a penny for your warts’ sketch appears about five minutes in)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9qJhozOAl4
--Gavcrimson (talk) 12:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Neither Luke Ford nor IMDB is a reliable source David in DC (talk) 22:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Its hard not to get frustrated. There are now four different references backing up this information, personally I think most people would consider that sourcing now meets a reasonable standard.
All I’m trying to do here is preserve this page's accuracy. Unfortunately others just seem hellbent on removing information based -I would argue- on their own agenda, rather than the good of Wikipedia as a research tool. --Gavcrimson (talk) 12:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Look for pity's sake leave Gavcrimsons work alone, it stands up to scrutiny and until now has not been altered or subject to question or ridicule, those that seek to discredit him should provide proof of what they say, they should not contest anything and should indeed be aware that Gavcrimson is a man of unquestionable knowledge and integrity, he references and dates his articles, he in my opinion is beyond reproach[discredit]and should be left alone to provide us the public with information that is beyond any of us and brings new understandings of the past, in this case Suzy Mandel and prior to this the quite lovely Mary Ruth Maxted nee Quilter [Millington] 1945-1979.Get a grip and leave his work alone for others such as myself to take pleasure in..The problem with works in the public domain as this episode and the one before it has indeed shown is there are far too many people likely to have views and alter things without providing answers. I call upon these people to put up or shut up. Rbt Foot.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.207.30 (talk) 13:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
With regret I am deleting all of my original research to this page, as it seems in constant threat of being challenged/deleted anyway, and I no longer wish to be associated with this site. --Gavcrimson (talk) 14:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)