GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rhain (talk · contribs) 11:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one! Expect a review shortly. Rhain (he/him) 11:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Background

Reception

References

  • Significantly more than I expected there to be in the source, but what you pointed out is correct, I do not think there is any place in this article I can use that source for.
  • Had more material than I expected, incorporated.
  • Incorporated.
  • I'm trying to avoid too much emphasis on commentary related to the ladder sequence itself. The ladder sequence ironically enough could get its own article, as stupid as that idea is, but this article is about the song.
  • I had a feeling this would be the case, but figured it was worth bringing them up to be sure.
  • Passing mention, don't really think anything here can be used.
  • Don't think there's much to use here either.
  • Not sure about this one.
  • Doesn't mention the song.

I'll look into the material of these to see if anything can be implemented. Thanks for bringing these to my attention! See above comments for what I ended up incorporating.

Images

Result

This was an interesting read—thanks for writing! A bit of copy-editing is needed, but certainly nothing insurmountable. A lot of my comments are nitpicky so feel free to disagree or ask for clarification, and anything written like this is purely a personal suggestion. I'll likely do another pass once my comments are addressed—until then, putting this on hold. Rhain (he/him) 13:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing! I've addressed all the above comments. λ NegativeMP1 07:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks NegativeMP1! I left a response above regarding the reference, and will take another look at the article soon. Rhain (he/him) 07:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've done some minor editing of formatting and prose, and I think the article looks great in that regard. After looking over the references, though, I can't help but feel there's more content to be added—something akin to a Composition or Composition and lyrics section, discussing the song's instrumentation and lyrical interpretation. Some relevant reference excerpts:

I also found some other bits that might fit in Reception:

Let me know your thoughts. Rhain (he/him) 23:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for compiling some of this together, I'll take a look into creating a composition and lyrics section soon. It'll take a bit for me to figure out the quirks of that, though. This is my second time creating an article on a song, and first time trying to get one to GA. λ NegativeMP1 03:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries at all! I have no interest in failing this nomination, so take as much time as you need. Let me know if you'd like any help at all—I'm happy to write something up to start with, provide some more ideas, or simply point you to other articles for reference. Rhain (he/him) 04:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I still plan on doing this, I just slowed down on editing after having to do some stuff, primarily coordinating with people on how to honor the death of editor Vami IV. Hopefully within the coming days I'll work on this. λ NegativeMP1 02:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Take all the time you need. As above, let me know if you'd like me to take a crack first, especially while you're busy with more important matters. Thanks for keeping me in the loop. Rhain (he/him) 02:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I took a crack at a composition section with what I felt could be incorporated. It's kinda small, but I'm looking to hear your thoughts. I'm also considering adding a sample of the song for the section. λ NegativeMP1 22:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding that, NegativeMP1—it looks great! I've made some adjustments per my comments above. I actually had the same thoughts regarding a sample; I'm sure most parts of the song are suitable, but an excerpt supported by commentary would be especially great. Let me know your thoughts, and if you need any assistance. Rhain (he/him) 23:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added a sample on the section that some pointed out as having "cheesy" lyrics. I think that basically marks the end of what all can be done with this article, but I'll leave that up to you. I greatly appreciate the source searching and adjustments you made! λ NegativeMP1 18:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree—this basically marks the end of my suggestions! That sample works great. I'll make some minor changes on my way out (including expanding the audio caption to make its usage clearer) but that's about it from me. This is all yours: ! Congratulations. Rhain (he/him) 00:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]