The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
|
|
Be advised that a topic closely connected with Pipim has been nominated for deletion. That article is Generation of Youth for Christ. YOU can vote Keep/Delete/other here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation of Youth for Christ. – Lionel (talk) 00:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
To IP editor: the AfD notice is proper per WP:CANVASS. And another editor has restored it. If you don't like it I recommend that you stop refactoring and stop edit warring and take it to ANI. – Lionel (talk) 01:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm sure this comes as no surprise to anyone that 50.72.159.224 has been blocked as a sockpuppet of... Bello! I move that we cancel his bombardment of tendentious edit-requests and collapse them. Meanwhile I'm going to request semi-prot of the article. – Lionel (talk) 07:58, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Controversial Articles Should Only be Edited by Registered Editors, IMO. A lot of work goes into the editing process and then someone without a track record here at Wikipedia can come in and stir up the feathers without accountability. We need a rule. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 00:24, 8 July 2011 (UTC) See WP:HUMAN — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.228.224.141 (talk) 00:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi all, I have some other articles I prefer working on, but this article's citation consistency is a mess. We need to agree on the style and work to make all the citations fit the style. Perhaps agreeing on the same templates would be a start. Another area to address is that the tense for the whole article needs changing? now that Dr. Pipim has removed himself from active spiritual leadership. And, one more, the tone of the article needs to be made more objective. Right now, it seems that someone who really likes Dr. Pipim wrote the article. It is ok to like him, but the tone needs to change and be more objective. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 04:34, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
In an attempt to standardize the citations in this article, let's use the following templates. (If our suggestions can be improved upon for better consistency. Let us know.):
For a website:
Template:Cite web: Let's use month day, year
I went ahead and reverted the New IP who engaged in a controversial removal of material without using the talk page. The material relates to the positions the individual Dr. Pipim had obtained.--Fountainviewkid (talk) 02:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Not sure but it might be worth noting that Dr Pipim was scheduled to be re-baptized, but it was cancelled due to a new victim coming forward publicly. This has been covered by the flagship independent Adventist media publications Adventist Today and Spectrum Magazine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.33.136.93 (talk) 14:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Samuel Koranteng-Pipim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)