Archives:1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 90 days
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Roblox. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Roblox at the Reference desk.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
Pokémon Brick Bronze was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 4 March 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Roblox. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Material from Roblox was split to List of Roblox games on 2021-05-12 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution.
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers, dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of (if such appeared in the article) using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Section headings, headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?] Thinking of Roblox Studio
This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, then an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.[?]
Try to make the article have a better flow. Some sentences are quite short and can easily be merged with other sentences.
Expand the infobox: There are many more parameters that can be filled there; there isn't even a link to the website!
External links should go above references (at least I believe)
In § Development, it seems to read as more a timeline than an actual paragraph
There are some sections that can easily be merged, for example § Players, is this really worth a whole section?
This is just my opinion, but the article seems to go into a bit too much detail. All of the sets include a code that can be used to redeem virtual items.
Once again, just some of my opinions, I may be completely wrong! — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 09:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:Berrely, I've implemented a couple of your suggestions, there is a bit of a problem with LEADCITE, since most of the content in the lead is not actually cited elsewhere in the article, we have to keep the citations there for now, or otherwise it would fail WP:V. I'm not entirely sure how to fix that at the moment, but expanding the "Development" section (which is definitely the weakest one IMO) to include a more general overview of the history of Roblox might help, and would also help with the other problems with that section. I am fairly sure, from looking at a few prominent articles, that References are supposed to be above external links though. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Devonian Wombat, sorry for replying so late! Apologies I was viewing on mobile and got confused by the references, you are correct on that front. The reason there shouldn't be citations in the lead is that the lead is meant to relay information already said in the article, but this is not a huge problem. Good job on massively improving this article (really comparing the current article from when you first edited it and now is astounding)! — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 09:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest splitting the Erik Cassel article from ROBLOX; Why on earth is Erik Cassel not a separate article? Erik is a vital person to ROBLOX's history, and articles like Alex Balfanz, Uplift Games or Adopt Me! have already been developed without any questioning from the community, so the Erik Cassel page should also be a separate one from ROBLOX. This does not deserve to be a redirect page. It's way more important than that. He also doesn't have a minor appearance like the developers mentioned in this, he literally was one of the creators of the game. MatEditzWiki (talk 15:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is not inherited. Every topic is evaluated separately. For Erik Cassel to have an article, reliable secondary sourcing that meets WP:GNG must be provided. -- ferret (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good source for Erik Cassel's huge involvement in Roblox - [1][2] I believe these two together at minimum are sufficient reliable secondary sources. Countless articles from large outlets mention and build upon this trove of information. Shredux (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 March 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Meta Quest 2, Meta Quest Pro released on roblox on September 27th, 2023. Please put that date instead of just September 2023. Lsijr (talk) 16:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If we're classifying Roblox as a game platform and design system, and not as a video game itself, then it's not a long form work or a work of any kind, so the name shouldn't be italicized, right? Snowmanonahoe (talk·contribs·typos) 20:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I consider it a real game but that my opinion 96.125.230.79 (talk) 20:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Snowmanonahoe Per the template doc, add |italic title=no if it is not appropriate for the article. -- ferret (talk) 22:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I know that, I'm asking because changing the formatting of the title of an article with 300,000 pageviews in the past month seems like something that needs consensus. Snowmanonahoe (talk·contribs·typos) 22:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, seemed you blamed the infobox and didn't understand why it worked the way it does. I've no opinion. Sounds valid enough. -- ferret (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
New tools
I added information on the introduction of new tools to the company page, IceWelder reverted my edits and suggested moving it to the game platform page.
Is this kind of information suitable for this page (I add it right away with 'ref'):
In March 2024, Roblox introduced two tools to speed up 3D content creation: automatic avatar customisation and a texture generator. Avatar customisation automatically converts 3D body meshes into live animated avatars. Texture generator allows you to create the appearance of objects using text descriptions.[1][2] Buuzbashi (talk) 13:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Coverage by reliable sources, which is often rare for updates of this nature and a platform like Roblox. I'd say it's fine. Don't say "Spring" though, per MOS:SEASONS. -- ferret (talk) 14:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much, put the correct month by source -- Buuzbashi (talk) 14:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 March 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please add to the History section, 2018-present information:
In March 2024, Roblox introduced two tools to speed up 3D content creation: automatic avatar customisation and a texture generator. Avatar customisation automatically converts 3D body meshes into live animated avatars. Texture generator allows you to create the appearance of objects using text descriptions.[1][2] Buuzbashi (talk) 04:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]