Rega Planar 3 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 6, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Rega Planar 3 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 December 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
"iconic"? "household name"?. This reads like it was written by the company's PR department. Maybe in the audiophile world it's well known, but few UK households today even have a record player. I've certainly never heard anyone refer to this brand. And who is "Gandy"? And there needs to be some explanation of why the opinions of Jim Clements et al (whoever they are) are significant. Colonies Chris (talk) 10:56, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
agreed, this "iconic" brand name has 0 recognition in the UK. technics or vestax would be recognised as standards of quality and use, but no dj i've asked has even heard of rega, perhaps 20 years ago it was known in the UK, but now no way. this article looks like a PR job, needs editing for NPOV188.220.151.59 (talk) 13:04, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Rega Planar 3 received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 14:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Ohc ¡digame!
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 14:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
None
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
|
b. Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article:
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. You've done great work, and I am quite happy to assist you in improving it. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 13:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 11:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)