This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ricardus, you are confused between copyright in musicial compositions (publishing) and copyright in sound recordsings (indicated by the (P) symbol). I will need to correct your recent edits. --feline1 09:45, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
I have been digging around on the PRS-MCPS database this morning (http://www.mcps.co.uk ) The legal situation regarding Kraftwerk's publishing arrangements is nowhere near as straightforward as "from 1975 onwards, they had 100% ownership of all their compositions". Whilst the names "Kling Klang Verlag" and "Kling Klang Musik GmbH" certainly regularly appear on the PRS-MCPS database against their songs from 1975 onwards, numerous entries still also show percentages owned by at least a dozen other companies (mainly various EMI companies).
In any case, owning full publishing rights on your own material does not give you "100% artistic freedom"! (if only!) - this is a very naive and simplistic attitude. At best, it simply means you get higher %age revenue stream from radio/TV broadcast royalties and mechanicals from record releases - but the downside is that you no longer get paid publishing advances by your publishing company.--feline1 10:27, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Could someone with a better knowledge of Kraftwerk than me confirm the writing credits? The back of my CD has the instrumental tracks as 1, 5, 6, 11, 12 (thus credited to Hutter, Schneider). That would leave 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10 credited to Hutter, Schneider, and Schult. Correct? The article is slightly different from this. Grievous Angel 18:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
The supplementary images towards to end of the article are currently tagged for deletion (due Sunday 28th) unless suitable fair use excuses are provided. As they are not the main image representing the album in the info panel should they be let go? Initially I thought that showing the contents of original vinyl releases would be cool (in this age of CDs and digital downloads), but nowadays I am tending to favour deletion unless they are showing something that cannot otherwise be put into worded form. In short, these are decorative elements rather than useful information. Ricadus 17:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
The 1st appearance of their Micromoog was in the late 1977 video 'Showroom Dummies'. Kraftwerk didn't use it on 'Radio-Activity' and it never appeared on any tours. That harsh sound from 'Antenna' is very easy to make with Minimoog's 3rd oscillator as a modulation source, the same about bass pseudo-apreggios from 'Radio-Activity' and 'Antenna'.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Radio-Activity. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Radio-Activity/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Article requirements: All the start class criteria |
Last edited at 23:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 03:49, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Radio-Activity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Part of the opening paragraph was changed from from "Unlike Kraftwerk's later albums, which featured language-specific lyrics, only the titles differ between the English and German editions" to "To cater to the band’s international audience, it was released in both German and English language editions", implying the actual content of the album, not just the labeling, differed. I believe the earlier text is correct, with the album being bilingual and identical in both markets. Can anyone confirm or deny?ChasFink (talk) 16:04, 30 March 2018 (UTC)