GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 18:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take this on, as it's the oldest review currently up, and we need to keep the line moving. --ProtoDrake (talk) 18:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review

@CaliforniaDreamsFan:, I've had an initial look through the article and there are some things that stand out.

References
Grammar/Formatting

That's all for now. I'll have another look through when these issues have been addressed. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:08, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Response 1 from CaliforniaDreamsFan

@ProtoDrake: - Done both. Finished archiving references, updating references, adding citations and re-formatting dates. Some links and references had to be removed and/or replaced as they were unable access, etc. (Changes can be found here)

Thank you for the quick response. Having looked over it again, I feel that this article can pass now. Keep up the good work. --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! :) GirlsAlouud (talk · contribs} 08:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]