This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Gauntlet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
whoa that is crazy, it must be so cold there.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Operation Gauntlet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Official History of the Canadian Army in the Second World War Volume I Six Years of War: The Army in Canada, Britain and the Pacific pp.302–307. Keith-264 (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
@Jay D. Easy: pls don't suppress centring.Keith-264 (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
I didn't start the article, I expanded it and I didn't put that photo in (or did I?). I didn't know that you had changed any images so if you want those back, be my guest, all I saw was that you had de-centred the captions. If you look at articles with 300px images in the info or whatever boxes, the campaignboxes are of lesser width (something to do with a recent change) and the recommendation was to reduce the px to 250 or so to narrow the info or whatever box to the same width as the campaign boxes. If the info and the campaignboxes are showing the same width on your screen, I suggest you mention this on the milhist talk page. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 23:00, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
@Seligne: I've added a disambiguation to LT and t. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:23, 25 May 2021 (UTC)