Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Magiciandude (talk · contribs) 18:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 23:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'll be giving this a go! And ugh, those salsa vibes and horns are doing it for me. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 23:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Well-written[edit]

Nothing that a fresh pair of eyes can't bring up to scratch. Feel free to revert my copyedits/tweaks. Of course, lovely work here!

• At the New Year's Eve concert in the same year — which concert? Any specific title or location?
• In a similar review of the album, — this sentence is a bit confusing. Is this quote: "how little consequence she is", positive or negative? The conjunction "where" makes an unclear connection; do they believe that Reguiera outperformed her on the remix?
• It became her Spanish-language — "first", "second", or some other qualifier seems missing.

Verifiable with no original research[edit]

A lot of prominent Mexican and American newspapers, looks good on a reliability front. Us Weekly is citing a pretty uncontroversial statement. As well, the New York Post is used minimally and only for opinion, its presence doesn't harm the article much. No copyvio issues during the spot-check. A fair few quotes in the "Reception" section, but it doesn't come off as heavy-handed.

• Here's the Sun Sentinel review on Newspapers.com, the dead link can now be fixed!

Spot-check[edit]

• Torres, Richard (May 28, 2000). "Latin Sounds: Gloria Estefan the Baladeer". Newsday. p. D25. Archived from the original on January 8, 2024. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  • I've removed one citation: the "radio-friendly" bit almost subtly implies the opposite. Looks good otherwise. Y
• Niurka, Norma (May 3, 2000). "Gloria caribeña". El Nuevo Herald (in Spanish). p. 101. Archived from the original on May 8, 2023. Retrieved May 8, 2023.
  • Looks good when translated. Y
• Martinez, Gerald (June 1, 2000). "Caribbean Soul!". Sunday Mail. p. 12. ProQuest 326211996. Archived from the original on October 16, 2023. Retrieved May 8, 2023.
  • Looks good with other ref. Y
• "Abre su 'alma caribena'". Palabra (in Spanish). March 28, 2000. p. 8. ProQuest 377137404. Archived from the original on October 16, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  • Looks good when translated. Y
• Marymont, Mark (May 28, 2000). "At 74, King's Blues Strong as Ever". Springfield News-Leader. p. 5G. Archived from the original on January 8, 2024. Retrieved May 8, 2023.
  • Looks good. Y
• Spencer, Neil (May 14, 2000). "Arts: Music: Pop Releases Gloria Estefan Alma Caribena". The Observer. p. 10. ProQuest 250449959. Archived from the original on October 16, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  • Looks good. Y

Broad in its coverage[edit]

Preliminary checks on TWL, Google Books/News, ProQuest, Newspapers.com, as well as general searches, make me confident that the article is broad in coverage. At a glance, I was hoping for more about the instruments, mixing, genres, but some of these details are found in the "Reception" section. I think this structure works well!

Neutral[edit]

The consensus seems to be represented fairly, and all quotes or opinions are attributed.

Stable[edit]

No recent content disputes or edit wars.

Illustrated[edit]

Standard song cover, looks nice.

• Consider writing the "not replaceable" and "respect for commercial oppurtunities" rationales.

Summary[edit]

@Magiciandude: Great work here! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the slight delay, I'm working on it now. Erick (talk) 16:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Averageuntitleduser Alright, I've addressed the issues brought up except for the non free rationale, which I replaced with the standard album/single template. Erick (talk) 16:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Magiciandude: No worries, and the license works nicely. Alright, one final comment! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 04:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Averageuntitleduser I fixed the dead link as requested. Erick (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fabulous! Happy to promote. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 21:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]