This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nihang article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In a paragraph you write ....They have , says Trumpp, no regular chief or disciple, yet one hears of their Guru, whose "LEAVINGS" are eaten by their disciples .... What is meant by this?
Just a note on this passage, "The Nihangs wear checkered dresses of a particular shade of blue known as "electric-blue."[3], bangles or bracelets of steel round their wrists (Kara), and quoits of steel (Chakra) in their lofty conical blue turbans, together with daggers, knives and swords of varying sizes (Kirpan), and an iron chain.
The bracelets of steel and dagger are not a Nihang custom, but practiced by all observant Sikhs. The article as is suggests this is exclusive to Nihangs.KVND 23:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KVND (talk • contribs)
I thought only the AKJ are known as Akalis? Not the Nihangs? Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 12:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
I have removed the statement below from this entry. This is because is give the impression that the SAD is the political representives of the Nihang, which is incorrect (a reading of the sources cited originally at the end of the article will show that ) Of course if you can cite evidence to the contray please revert. " In politics, the order is represented by the Shiromani Akali Dal, founded in the early years of the twentieth century. Members of the party, like their Nihang counterparts, also don bright electric-blue turbans " Narncruiser 12:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Article Akali phoola singh was created containing mostly copy and paste from other sources, so I blanked and redirected it to the Phula Singh section here. I tried to expand the section with sources from amritworld.com and Bharat Rakshak, but after adding two minor cites I decided to tag it with expand-sect as this area is outside by expertise. The blanked text is still available in the history but before archive.org's current technical difficulties I found most of the text originated here:
Note the tripod page may appear blank but does infact include white on white text. -Wikianon (talk) 19:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Holla.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Holla.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Holla.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010326/punjab1.htm
I did not mean to offen you or anyone else, if I have then I apologise.
Now, I changed the use of cannabis from 'smoking' to 'using' however the difference is the same in actual fact, ie the effect of cannabis on the brain whether smoking or otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.59.97 (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
'Electric Blue' is the name of a Porn video series, secondly Nihangs wouldn't have used the term 'Electric Blue' back in the 16th to 18th Centuries as the local electricity board wasn't up & running and neither was their descriptive use of the language language, so for all intents and purposes its pov. However I replaced it with the urdu term 'Bijli' to save you the embarrassment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.59.97 (talk) 13:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
"Many Nihangs allow themselves to drink alcohol[1] though intoxicants are considered forbidden by other Sikhs."
This statement has repeatedly and unjustifiably been removed. The BBC, unless someone can point out otherwise, is a generally a very good and reliable source. The last time it was blanked a statement was added in the edit summary that someone or other was excommunicated from the Sikh religion with the implication, I suppose, that he was not a reliable source of information and thus this statement about alcohol was unsubstantiated. This reasoning extremely poor as it bears no meaningful relationship to logic. The person cited as supposedly being excommunicated was not Stephanie Hegarty, the author of the source article so there is no relationship between the source and the alleged excommunication. The article quotes several people, anyone of whom could have made a statement on alcohol noted by the author. Even if excommunicated the person said it, he could have been excommunicated for any number of reasons which have no relationship to the tendency to drink alcohol or his truthfulness or accuracy about alcohol. If you disagree with the alcohol statement then cite a contrary source. Waerloeg (talk) 04:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Please view WP:RSUW, there is a clear ban of alcohol and drugs for Nihangs (except hemp) according to the Buddha Dal documents (official international head of the Nihangs) and the articles and books available, your view is of a significant-minority view and therefor does not warrant the change of the title. Jujhar.pannu (talk) 06:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
References
Not one of the references used to confirm Sahibzada Fateh Singh started the Nihangs is WP:Verifiable. I want to see the exact passages that state he started the Nihangs. Thanks SH 11:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nihang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
@WikiDan61:, can you explain your revert of the Nihang today section removal? I think it's pretty uncontroversial that adding recent news incidents involving large and very old orders or groups gives WP:UNDUE prominence to said incident. It would be better to have a general section on its militant attitude using academic sources, but the current version isn't in line with Wikipedia policies. Please explain your reasoning in the edit summary, as I did, before reverting. 117.251.198.151 (talk) 01:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)