WikiProject iconComputer science Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

WikiProject iconComputing: Software Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Wiki Education assignment: Digital Writing[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KoJa23 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Applejuicelover444.

— Assignment last updated by OsseusIgni (talk) 13:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Does this article need to be rewritten?[edit]

@Siroxo: Why does the article have these cleanup tags? Jarble (talk) 18:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi there. I had been trying to help maintain this article, but it kept (and apparently keeps) drifting more towards a PR focus on what the product will one day do and buzzwords / marketing pushed by the developers, often citing the developers themselves, churnalism, or various unreliable primary sources. I couldn't really keep up with the additions without resorting to frequent reverting, which I didn't want to do, so I tagged it. I didn't want to overload tags so I settled on 2.
Worries remain today. Here's a quick problem I found, though I'm sure there are more: The Mojo programming language aims to be fully compatible with the Project Jupyter ecosystem. It plans to add a borrow checker, an influence from Rust, and to add integration to transparently import Clang C/C++ modules and transparently generate a foreign function interface between C/C++ and Mojo.. Adding marketing like this is certainly UNDUE/non-NPOV unless multiple fully independent (like WP:ORGIND sources) are reporting it.
Given the way it's developing, it's likely this article should be in draft space, but the AfD resulted in keep.
siroχo 23:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]