Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

• There are at least four dead links.[1]

Two less now... L∴V 17:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Symptomatic diagnosis

• There has been a tag asking for clarification since July.

reworded and clarified. L∴V 13:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Microscopic examination of blood films

• The last paragraph looks like a personal observation unless it can be reliably cited.

Prophylactic drugs

• This section is completely uncited.

Mosquito nets and bedclothes

• Third paragraph is uncited.

Vaccination

• There is an external link in the third paragraph, which should be converted to an inline citation. External links should appear only in the External links section.

Removed L∴V 23:11, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• What are the sources for the information in the sixth and seventh paragraphs?

Sickle-cell disease

• This section has been tagged as uncited and potential original research since April.

Thalassaemias

• This section is also uncited.

Society and culture

• There is an external link in the last paragraph, which should be converted to an inline citation. External links should appear only in the External links section.

Fixed. L∴V 23:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Malleus Fatuorum 15:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• As the citation problems listed remain unaddressed, this article has now been delisted. --Malleus Fatuorum 15:33, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]