![]() | Red light therapy was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 3 April 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Low-level laser therapy. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Low-level laser therapy.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Low-level laser therapy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2022 and 24 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Claudia Iparraguirre (article contribs).
Should the title of the article not be "Low Level Laser Therapy" as opposed to "Photobiomodulation"? If they refer to the same concept, there are far more citations to the former on pubmed.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.185.64.86 (talk • contribs) 13:17, August 24, 2006.
This is a bit confusing. Duckduckgo's summary of this article is
>Red light therapy is an ineffective kind of light therapy in which the skin of the patient is exposed to long-wavelength red light, near or including the infrared portion of the spectrum, during a series of sessions. There is no evidence that RLT is effective at treating the skin or any other part of the body for any medical condition. RLT is being promoted in the popular media with unproven claims of multiple benefits
But I don't see any of that text in the article. What is happening? Justpasding (talk) 01:59, 31 October 2023 (UTC)