This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Linguistics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. ‹ The template below (WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. › Ancient Germanic studies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Germanic studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Germanic studies articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Germanic studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Germanic studiesTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Germanic studiesAncient Germanic studies articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Norse history and culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This should be a redirect to Germanic language. That article already fully covers the subject. Enhance that article if needed rather adding YARA (yet another redundant article). - Kbh3rd 02:33, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

• This is a part of the list of Indo-European languages. First, it should be retained because I've noticed that some of the languages given on the page you have linked to aren't real languages, but dialects. Second, the layout of having a separate page for each subgroup is easier to read. Third, there are a lot of pages that this page links to; deleting them would be even more redundant. Fourth, this series that I am working on (Indo-European) needs to be a part of a List of world languages, which would link to the IE page as a family. This project will put the most comprehensive language information into Wikipedia for good. --Merovingian[[Image:Atombomb.gif|]]Talk 03:19, Sep 14, 2004 (UTC)
  • I see where you're going with this now. The 'see also' is good. (BTW, have you seen my contribution to Talk:Proto-Indo-European_language ;) - Kbh3rd 05:30, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Haltsnovian language is orphaned. Should it link here somehow? kwami (talk) 07:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Germanic languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080108011735/http://www.dsl.ac.uk/dsl/SCOTSHIST/output4.php?file=NEW-Revised1Introduction.htm to http://www.dsl.ac.uk/dsl/SCOTSHIST/output4.php?file=NEW-Revised1Introduction.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Germanic languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722160911/http://www.nordiska.uu.se/arkiv/konferenser/alvdalska/konferensbidrag/Sapir.pdf to http://www.nordiska.uu.se/arkiv/konferenser/alvdalska/konferensbidrag/Sapir.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The statement that Afrikaans had "a significant influx of vocabulary from other languages" is not only largely debatable, but it maybe even reeks of politics, which many of us Afrikaans speakers feel should have no place in the field of linguistics whatsoever. One does not even know why Afrikaans should have received this lable on its own, while other Germanic languages had an even greater "influx from other languages" (e.g. mixing up words of Germanic and Latin origins to an overwhelming degree, as was done in English). In reality, there are only a small handful of words from Asian and African origins in everyday standard Afrikaans, and even a word such as "baie" (meaning many) which was always thought to have come from "the East", now appears to have had its origin squarely in Lower Saxony, Germany. The drawing up of word lists to show that Afrikaans' origins were creole, serves no moral purpose. If it were true, I myself would have embraced the notion as part of our shared history, but one cannot be "politically correct" and override historic fact. That was done all too many times in our turbulent past. It simply cannot be allowed to be done again, with the scale now only tipped to "the other side". Mieliestronk (talk) 07:57, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]