This article was nominated for deletion on October 24, 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on January 13, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: No consensus, 26 March 2024, see discussion. keep, October 24, 2015, see discussion. keep, May 15, 2007, see discussion. keep, January 13, 2006, see discussion.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Airlines This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. This article is supported by the airline project. Italy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unless (in the future) it becomes obligatory to have the table format, please keep the list format, for the following reasons:

• The table drastically increases the amount of characters unnecessarily and becomes less accessible and more confusing to edit.
• The terminated and Charter destinations should be clearly separated and as such in separate lists. This is much easier with the list format.
• The IATA and ICAO codes aren't necessary.
• The Flags aren't necessary.
• The Air One flights and Hubs/Seasonal/future/Focus airports are more clearly outlined in the list format.
• The regions and continents, to be able to browse the destinations more easily, are only in the list format.
• The list needs to be in alphabetical order by country and not city, again so that the destinations are better grouped.
• For the same reason again, countries should be in bold.
• If several airports are served within a city, the city itself only needs to be listed once.
• Tables should in general only be used where there are digits (or similar data) which need to be attributed to a certain column and row, otherwise I don't see the point.

Thanks, Speed74 (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons you have listed are totally against the set standard for table format lists at wikipedia which was approved by other editors after concensus, a single list for all destinations, and the listing style has wiki gold star featured list status, see Dragonair destinations and click on star on upper right hand corner.116.71.21.32 (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Speed74, I suggest bring it up for discussion at WP:AIRLINES for discussion if are against these table formats and gain new consensus before changing the format. Snoozlepet (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I Agree with Speed74. The list should at least be according to country and continent, not "mixing" them up all together. Timothyngim (talk) 04:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.skyscanner.net/flights-to/tw/airlines-that-fly-to-taiwan.html

https://www.skyscanner.net/flights-to/tpet/airlines-that-fly-to-taipei.html

73.87.74.115 (talk) 18:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Codeshare operated by China Airlines. TravelLover37 (talk) 19:04, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alitalia destinations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304120820/http://beta.alitalia.com/it_it?mboxSession=1449604853124-538854 to http://beta.alitalia.com/it_it?mboxSession=1449604853124-538854

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]