This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
There should be a section at the end listing all athletes who have won more than one medal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.218.186 (talk) 14:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Why does Wikipedia use "Women's", when the IOC uses "Ladies'"? Shouldn't we be following the IOC's convention(s)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.139.102 (talk) 08:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
At least I'm trying to contribute - what's your excuse? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.139.102 (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Look at my contribution history. You can see that I am contributing. Now step 1, learn to sign your comments... LugnutsDick Laurent is dead 07:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's pretty obvious that you're an *inconsistent* contributor at best, otherwise you wouldn't be here trolling me. And for the record, I *know* how to sign, I simply *choose* not to since it seems to drive folks like you up the wall. Cheers :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.139.102 (talk) 17:36, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it doesn't drive me up the wall. Now go cry to the admin board instead of doing anything meaningful. LugnutsDick Laurent is dead 19:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia follows it's own manual of style, and is not beholden to other conventions. If we're talking about an official title, that's another matter; if we're talking in general terms about an event, we go with our own style and conventions. OhNoitsJamieTalk 20:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. Just wondering though, if it's the IOC's official naming policy (or that of the respective sporting federations whose convention the IOC presumably follows), then why shouldn't that take precedence? Thanks again. 24.212.139.102 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not even the official site uses "Ladies" consistently. "Women" and "Men" are widely used for general purposes, while "Ladies" and "Gentleman" typically carries a more formal connotation. OhNoitsJamieTalk 21:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]