Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 16:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Hydrangeans (talk). Self-nominated at 20:59, 10 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Liberty 5-3000; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • @Ezlev: Thank you for the review! You mention that The first three hooks are problematic as they rely solely on the fictional content of Anthem—does that include ALT2? Since that hook places Anthem in the context of the real-life person Rand's wider corpus, with it being different from most of her usually love triangle-filled stories, is that a hook that involves content outside the fictional story of Anthem? As for the lead problem, I've revised the lead so that instead of saying in wikivoice Liberty 5-3000 is an 'unconquered heroine', it's instead repeating part of the quote calling her "as spiritually unconquered as" Equality 7-2521, quoting the CliffsNotes. In other words, the lead sentence now states, In scholarly analyses, Liberty 5-3000 has been considered a "spiritually unconquered" character who is on par with Equality 7-2521 and a submissive trophy wife who is ultimately passive. And the quotation has a citation note appended to it, the same one as used to verify the statement, with attribution to the author, in the body text. Does that resolve the issue in the lead and make ALT2 and ALT3 good to go? If I misunderstood any part of the problem, do let me know. Hydrangeans (she/her) (talk | edits) 22:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oops, you're correct that I miscounted, Hydrangeans! The first two hooks are problematic. Your fix to that sentence is good. Since it's come up here, I'll note that there is no consensus on the reliability of CliffsNotes but that I'm comfortable with its use in this article, particularly because the writer is a subject matter expert. ALT2 and ALT3 are approved! ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 22:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]