Liberal and Country League is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This redirect has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Exactly how are these not directly related to the LCL? It's like reverting edits on Iraq in Howard's article. Sure the two aren't the same, but they are very intertwined and play a vital part in explaining the broader picture. I almost smell a whiff of POV... Timeshift 03:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's nothing to do with POV... it's to do with the tedious repetition of content across articles. No new content of value was added to Wikipedia through those edits. I've noticed this across a wide range of articles that been recently created; I'm going to have to go through and write "original" content for them. michaeltalk 04:11, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What wasn't original about the additions to the LCL page? Timeshift 04:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
These lines are verbatim from the New LM article: "formed by Robin Millhouse, arguing that the Liberal Party of Australia was no longer worthy of the descriptor liberal ... emergence of the Australian Democrats led many New LM members, including Millhouse and his assistant Janine Haines, to join the fledging party, after which the New LM ceased to exist."
And this bit is a poorly-worded catch from South Australian Legislative Council: "Rural overweighting known as the Playmander resulted in LCL lower house minority and majority governments for decades. Upper house elections since 1941 have held 16 LCL and 4 ALP; voting rights were limited to the wealthier classes; suffrage was dependent on certain property and wage requirements. The electoral districts were drawn to favour regional areas with a 2:1 bias in place." (not only that, it isn't worded properly with "LCL lower house minority and majority governments for decades", and the poor placement of ;'s)
What original content? michaeltalk 04:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is free information and not copyrighted. Timeshift 04:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That wasn't my point. The point is that readers don't need the same basic information repeated over a number of similar pages. It doesn't add anything. michaeltalk 05:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Liberal and Country League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merge . Marcnut1996 (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I generally agree as I see your point, although the situation with the LCL was very different from the Victorians (the LCL was equivalent to the situation with the modern Qld LNP rather than the Victorian parties - it was a straight formal merger of the LF and CP). I think it needs a lot of work to make sure the content gets integrated properly so that we don't end up with a worse end product, as the long-standing LCL article is really very good whereas the much more recent state branch article is pretty much thrown together. It shouldn't be done if the merger is going to be half-arsed. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.