This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Not sure that this makes sense. Some are stubs, but some are rather long. The resulting article might be overlong. Sandstein 07:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I could see this merge happening, but the resulting article needs to be more than a dictionary entry, and more than a bunch of short articles lumped together, but instead needs to describe how courts decided the relevant jurisdictions for all of these scenarios. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There should be a wealth of sources addressing the interconnections between these concepts. BD2412T 22:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge; most of these stub articles have been around since 2005, suggesting that there is little appetite for expansion by the practitioners; so, best consolidated in one place, helping each stub by providing context. Klbrain (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: It is much more useful for the reader to have all this information in one place (when the alternative is a baker's dozen stubs). ~BappleBusiness[talk] 22:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I am fine with this. Bearian (talk) 18:52, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think at this point consensus is very clear. I am going to go ahead with this. BD2412T 03:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]