The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish cultureTemplate:WikiProject Jewish cultureJewish culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
The term legal status is ambiguous and does not properly represent the content of the section. The section does not discuss the status of the settlement under Israeli law, only under international law. I dont see why the title should be changed from an accurate one to a less descriptive one. nableezy - 14:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Legal status" does not necessarily imply Israeli law and a title is not meant to furnish details present in the text. The title is too long, distracting and dominant on the page, giving undue weight to the section. You used "legal status" on many other such articles. No need to make an issue of it here. --MichaelNetzer (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I *think* I used legal status when the section discusses the status of the settlement or outpost under Israeli law as well as international law. Such as for outposts, which are illegal under Israeli law, or for settlements with illegally expropriated private Palestinian land, which is likewise illegal under Israeli law. But for sections that discuss the status of the settlement under international law, and only under international law, I used Status under international law. I dont understand why the title is to long, how it is distracting or dominant, or how it gives undue weight to the section. Unless you can actually substantiate these unsupported assertions I dont see a need to respond to them. nableezy - 18:49, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Given the long section on attacks on Israeli settlers, a presentation of Israeli settler violence against Palestinians is needed in order to avoid a biased article.
I have just added archive links to one external link on Kiryat Arba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I think the last sentence (about the June 30 2016 attack) needs to be reworded:
"The attacker also wounded a security guard who responded to the scene before being shot to death.[15]"
I think you mean that the attacker was shot to death, not the security guard. If that's correct, then try:
"The attacker also wounded a security guard who responded to the scene before the attacker was /being/ shot to death.[15]" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.22.50 (talk) 21:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please somebody revert this genius edit, since redundant category is already included in "Mixed Israeli settlements".--Boots Dawson (talk) 05:57, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: :Since the TrickyH's edit was in question here. Its best if the editor attends this edit request. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 06:34, 7 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Before I started adding this cat to pages that already included the subcats of "mixed" or "religious" settlements, I read through the H:CAT page and I didn't see any statement that a page shouldn't belong in both a subcat and the parent cat. I'm happy to be proven otherwise if I'm not looking in the right place.TrickyH (talk) 21:49, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 3 external links on Kiryat Arba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
It says that the international community considers the settlements illegal and that Israel disputes this. Although this is true it is irrelevant mentioning that statement in that place or in the article altogether. Jake pres (talk) 00:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The view that this community constitutes a war crime is a significant covered in numerous sources, and as such we include it here. nableezy - 03:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am curious whether there exist references to Israeli disputation regarding the illegality of the settlements. Does Israel somewhere argue that the settlements are legal? John Tinker (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes of course. Israel divides settlements into two types: completely legal (most of them), and illegal (a few "outposts"). Settlements in the second class are regularly moved into the first class. In both cases, "legal" and "illegal" refer to Israeli domestic law; Israel doesn't recognise the applicability of international law. Zerotalk 03:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]