This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Kasich 2016 presidential campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/14/politics/john-kasich-gop-primary-pennsylvania-ballot/index.html talks about an issue that I suspect should be researched more and added to this article. In summary:

• Ohio governor John Kasich filed an application to be included on the primary election ballots in the state of Pennsylvania that had 2,184 signatures. The application requires at least 2,000 signatures.
• A Marco Rubio supporter filed a petition that 802 of the signatures on the John Kasich application were invalid.
• The Kasich campaign has admitted that at least 192 of the 802 names listed on the petition were in fact invalid. This would put Kasich under the 2,000 signatures needed.
• However, Kasich campaign is also saying that the petition itself is invalid as it was filed too late.
• The deadline for filing the original application was 5:00pm. The law says that objections must be filed within seven days of the filing deadline but does not specify a time. The petition was filed on the last day allowed but at 5:13pm. I believe the petition was filed on-line.
• The deadlines were set decades ago and in the past coincided with the close of the business office meaning 5:00pm. The state allows many things to be filed on-line and presumably accepts things due on a particular day up through 11:59pm of that day.

The matter has gone to court with the Kasich campaign arguing that the deadline is 5:00pm and the Rubio campaign arguing that the deadline is midnight at the end of the day. If Rubio is sucessfull then John Kasich will not be in the ballot in Pennsylvania. Kasich has stated that winning Pennsylvania is A key element to his campaign. At present he's in the lead there. --Marc Kupper|talk 21:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Although this was resolved before the election, I agree that it's worth mentioning. -KaJunl (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is Kasich's position on campaign finance reform / overturning unlimited secret contributions via dark pools?

Does he have a plan?

Ocdcntx (talk) 16:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a video I took of Kasich at Central Medford High School in Medford, Oregon on April 28, 2016. I was wondering if we could have it in the article? You can check the video out here. CookieMonster755 ^{📞 ✉ ✓} 23:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think this should be moved from the political positions section to the campaign section. -KaJunl (talk) 13:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of reports today that Kasich will suspend/end his campaign. So far, those reports cite to only unnamed sources, and there is no official word from the campaign. Until a reliable source surfaces, this should stay out of the article, including any reference to "was running" and the like. See WP:RSBREAKING. Brianga (talk) 17:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to The Green Papers, Kasich placed 3rd among all Republicans in the primary with 4,290,448 votes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.38.14 (talk) 03:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]