GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:33, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

Background and release

Composition

Critical reception

Commercial performance

Music video

Accolades

Track listings

Credits and personnel

Charts

Release history

References

General comments

Thank you for your patience; putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and please let me know when you're finished. — GhostRiver 22:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver: Okay, I've taken care of everything. Regarding your POV comment from the Critical reception section, I realized that I accidentally removed the source for the review, so I've added it back in. The source uses the word "unmistakably", so that's why I used "undeniable". If something else needs tending to, please let me know, but otherwise, thank you for the review. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 22:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've made some additional minor changes in the composition section and now believe this is up to caliber. Passing now. — GhostRiver 17:19, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]