This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Hurricane Dalilia (1989)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"The storm accelerated, headed directly towards the Hawaiian Islands." - This sentence would read better if you put the word "and" between the comma and "headed".
"the island chain recived more" - Typo
"While tracking near the Hawaiian islands," - Capitalization error; capital "I" on "islands"
"northwestern Hawaiian islands" - Same as directly above
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Request opened by block-evader. NeilNtalk to me 18:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, yes, but in this instance, the name Dalilia was a typo from when the EPHC transferred the storm name list to the NHC, so I'd argue that the intended version of the name was a hurricane in 2013 and 2001. YEPacificHurricane 16:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. No need for disambiguation. Laurdecltalk 07:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 23 October 2018. The result of the move review was Closed as endorsed.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Technically, yes, but in this instance, the name Dalilia was a typo from when the EPHC transferred the storm name list to the NHC, so I'd argue that the intended version of the name was a hurricane in 2013 and 2001. YE Pacific Hurricane 8:55 am, 9 February 2017, Thursday (1 year, 11 days ago) (UTC−8)
Oppose non reader helpful for an event. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unnecessary disambiguation. Wrongly implying there is another hurricane with this name, as the current title does, is NOT helpful to anyone. --В²C☎ 02:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Given that the name was only named such due to a typo, I'd argue that this is a special case. YEPacificHurricane 03:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support As the only topic of this name, no need for disambiguation. The hatnote is sufficient for those who are seeking another topic by a different name.--Yaksar(let's chat) 05:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.