Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 19:37, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Lede

Just a suggestion, there is a reference in the lead. Remove this and summarise it in the article, as the lede is meant to summarise the article.

• Lyrics and melody

Up to GA standard, however converting the quote to ((cquote)) can help with presentation. Not required though.

• Origins

I like this section, very detailed. Is referenced well and citations are filled in fully

• Meaning

Detailed and cited well. Quite a big final paragraph, but that's fine!

• In Through the Looking-Glass

Referenced well, good quotes and content.

• Other appearances in fiction and popular culture

This section summarises quite a bit of the lede, which is fine! Cited well.

• Notes -> References. However, I will let that fly past me.

Right then, review done. I'll pass this as the article is in good shape, although there are some non-required things I listed above to improve presentation.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Grand job! ⇒TAP 19:37, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]