This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The contents of the Degree of coherence page were merged into Higher order coherence on January 8th, 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
I'm tempted to request this be merged into the article on Coherence (physics), as a brief scan of both tell me they're covering a lot of the same material. Bibekbabupokharel, can you explain why this concept should be treated in a separate article? ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 21:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
This is mentioned for g(2), without explanation or reference. Suposedly, is has a gaussian decay of second order coherence. Nonetheless, the formula explicitly given in the main text describes exponential decay! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wouterretuow (talk • contribs) 10:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
The title is capitalized and I believe that this is wrong and forbidden by the wikipedia manual of style 2804:431:C7E2:F7DC:4030:9377:F4D4:FC45 (talk) 15:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have moved Orders Of Coherence into Higher order coherence (due to bad title). Now, I propose merging Degree of coherence into Higher order coherence. I think the content in Degree of coherence can easily be explained in the context of higher order coherence, and a merger would not cause any article-size problems in here. Degree of coherence has very few citations so it is not going to be difficult to merge. ReyHahn (talk) 08:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)