This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

"The space is considered to be both a graphic character and a control character^{[citation needed]} in ISO 646; this is probably due to it having a visible form on computer terminals but a control function (of moving the print head) on teletypes. ^{[original research?]}"

I can see what this is saying. In some respects the space would be considered a graphic character:

• it has a visual representation
• as such, where code 32 appears in the buffer of a text-mode VDU whose character set is ASCII or any superset thereof, one can be sure what to expect to see in that character cell
• fonts are likely to contain a glyph for it, even if that glyph has the appearance of a blank space (though this may depend on the platform); in any case, the character would have a width
• programming languages, database systems, etc. invariably allow it to be included within a string (if they support strings at all)

In other respects it is special:

• it is sometimes represented by a "control code" such as SP, in line with the control codes for ASCII characters 0-31 and 127.
• in the syntax of many text-based data formats and programming languages, it is a whitespace character just like CR, LF and HT
• in most modern programs that support multi-line display and/or editing of text (word processors, web browsers, text editors, email clients, etc.), it is treated specially in order to achieve word-wrapping and (in some cases) justification
• a daisywheel probably wouldn't include a petal for space; rather, the printer would be likely to just advance the print head when it receives a space character (this is perhaps the basis of the statement about teletypes).

Ironically, there are standard C functions iscntrl and isgraph, which consider the space to be neither a control character nor a graphic character, which is the opposite of this statement.

I suppose the only real conclusion of this is that the status of the space depends on your point of view. Still, we ought to find a link for the ISO standard on this. Moreover, the use of "probably" implies that the reason given is speculation, rather than research, so I'm not sure that tagging it with ((or)) is right.

What do people think we should do with the statement? — Smjg (talk) 02:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]