This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Godhra train burning article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days

A news item involving Godhra train burning was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 24 February 2011.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 27, 2012, February 27, 2015, February 27, 2017, February 27, 2020, February 27, 2022, and February 27, 2023.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Gujarat Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Mid-importance). Terrorism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The courts have ruled with smple evidence that this was an act of arson. The article is lying and biased about it and cannot be trusted. 2409:40C4:2A:24D7:18BB:F637:408D:CFBD (talk) 19:36, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Our policies on maintaining a Neutral point of view require us to summarize what reliable sources say, not what the courts say. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]