This article was nominated for deletion on 15 March 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This redirect is supported by WikiProject Musicians. Women in Music This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://gayatrinair.com/about-me. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2012082110001887. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Gayatri.nairr (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Ms.Fiddle,

I'm trying my best to answer your queries

• [1] Kumon is one of the most popular International English & Maths program and NOT a school news.
• [3] I understand that has been referred to mention that Nair went to that weekend school
• [4] It was a trace of vandalism, but Evelina Puzaite is a Concert pianist (linked to Puzaite website now, after cleaning up the vandalism)
• [5] Yes, it is a link to Purcell school - this has to changed to internal link rather than as a reference.
• [10] [12] appears to be Public videos, not private.
• [13] Original programme note with reference letter from Mr. Richard Frostick (Chief organiser of the show) has submitted to wikipedia before adding the link
• [19] Confirmation on whether it was a sell out / headline issue, can be confirmed by Head of Memory Clinic / CEO of Kings Foundation Trust, National Health Care (NHS, UK)

Many of the videos are filmed live from the location, that are referenced here. Added to that Nair has wide popularity in youtube and other online media. When last counted a combined subscribers of 17,000 and 2 million views in youtube alone.

37kellyave 08:46, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

I haven't done much before, so please forgive me if I'm doing this wrong :( Many of the references seem irrelevant;

• [1] is a school news/blog/thing.
• [3] is just a link to her former school's website, nothing to support what's written in the article.
• [4] is an episode of Peppa Pig (wtf?)
• [5] is, again, just a link to the school's website.
• [10] is a private video on YouTube.
• [12] is also a private video.
• [13] I'm not sure about; is a BBC Programmes page a reliable source?
• [19] is a video of her singing; again, nothing to support the assertion that it was a 'sell out' or that she was 'headlining' the concert.

Also, it seems like all of them are primary sources, and there are a lot of her YouTube videos used as references (would these be counted as self-published?) I don't think it meets WP:MUSICBIO either, but I'm not sure how this works. Lucyfiddle (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gayatri Nair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130504082622/http://www.purcell-school.org:80/ to http://purcell-school.org
• Added ((dead link)) tag to http://irecital.com/wp-content/uploads/southwarknews.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203061659/http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/arts-culture/gigs/search-and-vote/gayatri-nair to http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/arts-culture/gigs/search-and-vote/gayatri-nair

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit MarnetteD removed a ((linkrot)) tag, saying I rsan refill - it did not fix any of these nor did it show them as red items needing fixing - you will have to do them manually if you feel they need changes - once again Refill will not fix them. What the refill script will fix is not the standard of an acceptable citation. Citing a news article without providing the name of the publication is not acceptable. Failing to provide the publication date and author, when these are available, is at best sub-standard practice. That refill will (to some extent) fix completely bare URLs but will not improve partial citations is one of the flaws in this script. Until the citations are as full as they reasonably can be, this article should be properly tagged to indicate the lack. I will supply a more accurate tag. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 01:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are certainly free to add any tag that does not indicate that the citations can be fixed by reFill since they can't be fixed by that program. Moreover, you are free to do the work to needed to make any fixes that you feel necessary. If you don't know how to make those fixes there are several noticeboards where you can ask for help and instructions in how to perform the edits needed. MarnetteD|Talk 01:43, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have supplied a better tag -- I had forgotten how much ((linkrot)) implied that refill was the proper fix. It often isn't, even for totally bare URLs. I have corrected one of the cites, and i am well aware of how to format proper citations, thank you. I am not willing to do 20 or more on this article at this time. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 02:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]