![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on February 18, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
French wikipedia is reorded in actualy french as aposed to english translated literally into french — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.67.19 (talk) 2007-01-16T13:18:08 (UTC)
Maybe should one change the link from fr:Rochefort-en-Valdaine to an other village since the article was slightly improved ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.170.198.49 (talk) 2007-01-17T18:58:22 (UTC)
The subject already says it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JustN5:12 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC).
This article has mixed spellings, so I decided to change what was a mixture of American/British spellings to British spellings on the grounds that French is predominantly a European language, and therefore should follow a European style guide. --Île_flottante~Floating island Talk 21:41, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Certain Wiki-users have predicted that the French Wikipedia could eventually catch up to the German version of Wikipedia in terms of the number of articles, albeit these would presumably be of a lower quality. I'm not sure it will ever happen, but it would be a good thing if anybody could find reliable information about the probability of this occuring. ADM (talk) 06:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
This page is the result page, redirection, from searching for "piranha effect". However it's something completely unrelated!
In an interview with Andrew Lih, at http://www.salon.com/books/int/2009/03/24/wikipedia/ , Salon journalist Vincent Rossmeier says: "You also mention this theory called the Piranha effect, which, to really roughly summarize, is that if you have a bunch of people nibbling on the same subject, they'll devour it really well."
There's no relation at all between "french wikipedia" and the piranha effect, this defined, and the redirection should be cut. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.213.165.42 (talk) 19:41, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
I incidentally made a correction on another article, changing "French wikipedia" into "Wikipedia in french" with the following comment: "It is a bit ironic that I also have to correct that mistake on Wikipedia: there is no such thing as a "French Wikipedia", only a "Wikipedia in french"". And as I wanted to know whether that mistake was present on other articles, I made a search on "French Wikipedia" and found....this article.
Has the topic of the title for this article ever been discussed? On WP:fr we often have to remind people that they are not on the French Wikipedia (la Wikipédia française ie from France) but on the Wikipedia in french (la Wikipédia en français).
Am I wrong in understanding French Wikipedia as meaning Wikipedia from France, and thus not being the appropriate title ? Asavaa (talk) 21:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Is the French Wikipedia supposed to take into account these spelling reforms. Whether yes or no it would seem relevant to say so in this article since it would affect all of the French edition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reforms_of_French_orthography#The_rectifications_of_1990 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.102.31.22 (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article contains a translation of Wikipédia en français from fr.wikipedia. |
I added some text and sources using the French Wikipedia version of this page, and as per the translating instructions, have posted the above template to ensure copyright compliance. I'm still quite new to editing Wikipedia, and this is my first time expanded based on a foreign article, so if someone wants to review my changes and/or point out any mistakes I may have made, that would be appreciated. Bilorv (talk) 11:03, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
For the reference n. 10 in has been added a link to the publication titled "The most controversial topics in Wikipedia: A multilingual and geographical analysis", whis is a crtical review of the research published via arXiv.
In such a way, it has been also eliminated the previous "Missing or empty |url" warning message . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.14.139.30 (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Two weeks ago, I decided to be bold so I included a link to Wikipédia the French-language edition in the text of the top paragraph. Nobody objected (at least, until now). -- jw (talk) 21:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
However there is an issue: it is not clear to the reader that this is a direct link to Wikipédia en français. So I am now putting the question to the Wikiworld :
What form should this link take? ... here are four alternatives (others exist, too):
... the French-language edition ...
... the French-language edition ...
... the French-language edition ...
... the French-language edition ...
Please let me know your reactions! -- jw (talk) 21:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)