Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Catfurball (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Catfurball (talk) 15:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: * Ormond Beach should probably be wikilinked.

Overall, I think the writer could do with some more careful reading of the sources to verify all claims in the article. I'm happy to pass it if the above points are addressed. I think HOOK1 should be used, considering the alleged crime did not lead to a conviction. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Axem Titanium: Ormond Beach is linked in the articles introduction. And I have made improvements that you suggested to the article. Catfurball (talk) 18:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I meant it should be linked in the hook itself. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Catfurball: Were you done with your edits to the article? I still see some factual errors/misreading of sources that I identified above. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Axem Titanium: Since you do not like my work I with draw my nomination. Catfurball (talk) 15:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not asking you to withdraw the nomination; I'm asking you to address the issues I identified above, some of which you implemented and some of which you did not. The clause is still dangling. It's the whole hospital that closed, not just the rehabilitation facility. The 2.44 acres are not going to be used by Road A1A. These are specific and easily addressable issues. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Axem Titanium: Know are you happy with my changes. Catfurball (talk) 19:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making those fixes. I grouped some sentences together to address SounderBruce's proseline concerns. Passing. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: An interesting history for the former hospital; the 'alleged fraud' section seems imbalanced in weight given the rest of the page - opioid abuse and its consequences aren't surprising, unfortunately, in the 21st century. There are a few too many redlinks; many of those link might not be suitable for independent pages.

Klbrain (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]