Edits by a blocked sockpuppet account[edit]

Hello I have noticed edits made by Jay 66483 please can you revert them.212.31.113.2 (talk) 19:00, 25 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
He has been confirmed as a sock of shingling334 and is banned from editing.2A02:C7F:3B20:3E00:D1B0:C41:8D77:5636 (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keeping the edits will be blockevation.2A02:C7F:3B20:3E00:D1B0:C41:8D77:5636 (talk) 14:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not sure. They were made two days before the account was blocked. And no-one has challenged them - they look like improvements? Would have to be done manually as there are intervening edits since then. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It’s not improvements because this sock is known for spreading anti Turkish sentiments across Wikipedia.2A02:C7F:3B20:3E00:D1B0:C41:8D77:5636 (talk) 14:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They created multiple accounts like this one from the unbanned simple English wikipedia so they can access locked articles anonymously.2A02:C7F:3B20:3E00:D1B0:C41:8D77:5636 (talk) 14:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I see. Perhaps we could ask for a second opinion from User:Prussian Pigeon and/or User:AukusRuckus? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes and that’s the reason why I think it should be reverted pre sock version.2A02:C7F:3B20:3E00:D1B0:C41:8D77:5636 (talk) 14:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I will say, his repediate focus on Turkish political or cultural pages does seem suspicious to a degree. Does the original account this one is sockpuppeting have the same pattern of focus on Turkish political and cultural articles? Prussian Pigeon (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, no idea. Perhaps IP2A02 knows. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes it does he used to focus on Greek/Turkish related articles. He also reverted them himself because he is obsessed. Also done the same with the other sock multiple accounts with the same pattern.2A02:C7F:3B20:3E00:D1B0:C41:8D77:5636 (talk) 06:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requested move 10 February 2024[edit]

Doner kebabDöner – Kebab and Döner are different things. A döner is not a kebab and a kebab is not a döner. Döner is a shorter and more known name for the döner. I get way more hits with döner anyways. It is also desirable for the page name to be Doner. Either way, both Döner and Doner are accurate titles. Youprayteas (talk to me? | contribs) 13:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If, as you say, "a doner is not a kebab", then why does tr:Döner call it a type of kebab in the infobox? That article mentions "döner kebap" several times. Just plain Bill (talk) 18:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay, maybe so, but why use doner kebab instead of the shorter, simpler "döner" or "doner"? Youprayteas (talk to me? | contribs) 06:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]