This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the ((WikiProject Food and drink)) project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Not sure. They were made two days before the account was blocked. And no-one has challenged them - they look like improvements? Would have to be done manually as there are intervening edits since then. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They created multiple accounts like this one from the unbanned simple English wikipedia so they can access locked articles anonymously.2A02:C7F:3B20:3E00:D1B0:C41:8D77:5636 (talk) 14:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I will say, his repediate focus on Turkish political or cultural pages does seem suspicious to a degree. Does the original account this one is sockpuppeting have the same pattern of focus on Turkish political and cultural articles? Prussian Pigeon (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes it does he used to focus on Greek/Turkish related articles. He also reverted them himself because he is obsessed. Also done the same with the other sock multiple accounts with the same pattern.2A02:C7F:3B20:3E00:D1B0:C41:8D77:5636 (talk) 06:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.
Doner kebab → Döner – Kebab and Döner are different things. A döner is not a kebab and a kebab is not a döner. Döner is a shorter and more known name for the döner. I get way more hits with döner anyways. It is also desirable for the page name to be Doner. Either way, both Döner and Doner are accurate titles. Youprayteas (talk to me? | contribs) 13:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
English sources almost exclusively use "doner kebab" and very rarely "doner" by itself. It also seems that in Britain and a few other Western European countries the dish is colloquially just called "kebab". 157.157.113.101 (talk) 14:17, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If, as you say, "a doner is not a kebab", then why does tr:Döner call it a type of kebab in the infobox? That article mentions "döner kebap" several times. Just plain Bill (talk) 18:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay, maybe so, but why use doner kebab instead of the shorter, simpler "döner" or "doner"? Youprayteas (talk to me? | contribs) 06:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support either as proposed or as Döner kebab. It is called "Döner" with the umlaut in pretty much every other language. JIP | Talk 22:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose. We're not concerned about "every other language", since this is the English Wikipedia. English-language reliable sources typically use the unaccented "o". [1][2][3][4]162 etc. (talk) 21:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]